From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baron v. Prudence Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 1, 1942
315 Ill. App. 129 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,985. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 1, 1942

INSURANCE, § 320recovery of indemnity after reinstatement. Where policy of sickness insurance lapsed for nonpayment of premium, but was reinstated, and it contained a provision that in such event recovery could only be had for such sickness as began more than ten days after reinstatement, and on the eleventh day plaintiff suffered abdominal pains and was operated on for appendicitis on the twelfth day, there was no limitation on the type of sickness, and plaintiff was entitled to recover hospital and surgical expenses, for illness which began more than ten days after reinstatement.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. NUNCIO J. BONELLI, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at October term, 1941.

Barney L. Hollowick, for appellant;

Bert L. Luskin and Benjamin J. Schultz, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 1, 1942.


Summaries of

Baron v. Prudence Life Ins. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 1, 1942
315 Ill. App. 129 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Baron v. Prudence Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Belle Baron, Appellee, v. Prudence Life Insurance Company, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 1, 1942

Citations

315 Ill. App. 129 (Ill. App. Ct. 1942)
42 N.E.2d 137