From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banc, Am. Invest. Serv v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Aug 24, 2004
No. 02-04-223-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-223-CV

Delivered: August 24, 2004.

Appeal from the 342nd District Court of Tarrant County.

Jim Parker, Kuperman, Orr, Rial Albers, P.C., Austin, TX, for appellants.

Earl Rutledge, Hurst, TX, for appellee.

Panel D: LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellants are attempting to appeal the trial court's "Order of Referral to Mediation." On July 19, 2004, we notified appellants, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3, that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appears the order is not appealable. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05) (listing types of interlocutory orders that are appealable), §§ 154.021-.022 (Vernon 1997), § 154.023 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

Appellant's response to our jurisdiction letter does not state sufficient grounds for continuing the appeal. Because the complained-of order is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).


Summaries of

Banc, Am. Invest. Serv v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Aug 24, 2004
No. 02-04-223-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2004)
Case details for

Banc, Am. Invest. Serv v. Lancaster

Case Details

Full title:BANC OF AMERICA INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL DEGOLIER, AND TERRY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Aug 24, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-223-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2004)