From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Badillo v. Sheepshead Restaurant Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 2002
296 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-05457

Submitted March 6, 2002.

July 22, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated April 20, 2001, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to "restore" the action and denied that branch of its cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint.

Chesney Murphy, LLP, Baldwin, N.Y. (Gregory E. Brower of counsel), for appellant.

William Pagan Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Dylan Braverman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Before a note of issue was filed, the case was marked "inactive" when the plaintiff failed to appear at a scheduled discovery conference. Since no note of issue had been filed, the action was not subject to dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404 (see Murray v. Smith Corp., 286 A.D.2d 377; Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 A.D.2d 190; P. Cubed Enters. v. Roach, 265 A.D.2d 537). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to "restore" the action and properly denied that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Badillo v. Sheepshead Restaurant Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 2002
296 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Badillo v. Sheepshead Restaurant Assoc

Case Details

Full title:RAUL BADILLO, respondent, v. SHEEPSHEAD RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 491

Citing Cases

Pucar v. L.H

When the note of issue has been vacated, the case reverts to its pre-note of issue status, and CPLR 3404 is…

Myers v. Con Edison

Andre v. Bonetto Realty Corp., 32 AD2d 973, 974-975, 822 NYS2d 292 (2d Dep't 2006). "Thus, a motion to…