From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aviles v. Crystal Management

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 1996
233 A.D.2d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 7, 1996.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied; motion for resettlement granted insofar as to recall the unpublished decision and order of this Court entered on June 6, 1996 (Appeal No. 57946) and to resettle it to read as follows:

Before: Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Ellerin, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered April 17, 1995, which, to the extent appealed, granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment or. his claim pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), and which denied defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment on the same claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the cross-motion granted to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs claims pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).

Plaintiff, Julio Aviles, was a self-employed window washer who was hired by the third-party defendant, a tenant of a residential apartment, to wash the windows in her living room. This matter is factually similar to Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp. ( 211 AD2d 441, affd 87 NY2d 938), wherein the resident of a cooperative apartment hired a window washer to clean her windows, and, as in the case at bar, the tenant's actions were undertaken without the knowledge or consent of the owners and managers of the building. As in Brown, we find that plaintiff was engaged to clean windows as part of domestic cleaning, and thus the activity was not covered by Labor Law § 240 (1). Accordingly, defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action.


Summaries of

Aviles v. Crystal Management

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 1996
233 A.D.2d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Aviles v. Crystal Management

Case Details

Full title:VIRGILIO AVILES, SR., et al., Respondents, v. CRYSTAL MANAGEMENT, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 638

Citing Cases

Otero v. Cablevision of New York

The Court of Appeals has held that an owner of property may be held liable under Labor Law § 240 even where…

Conceicao v. Posimato

With respect to this issue, Pardo has come forward with sufficient proof in admissible form establishing that…