Opinion
1:22CV1021
08-07-2023
MAJED A. ATTIA, Petitioner, v. WARDEN JENNY HILDEBRAND, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [REGARDING ECF NO. 7]
Benita Y. Pearson, United States District Judge
On January 17, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation suggesting that Petitioner Attia's petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. See ECF No. 7. Objections were due within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation.
The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Parties must file any objections to a Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of service. Id.; Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). Absent objections, a district court may adopt a magistrate judge's report without review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
In the instant case, objections to the Report and Recommendation were due by June 30, 2023. None of the parties have filed an objection.Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 7. The Petition is denied.
After granting additional time to object, the Court denied Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections until October 26, 2023 (ECF No. 11) and ordered Petitioner to object no later than June 30, 2023. See ECF No. 13. Petitioner failed to do so and, therefore, waived the opportunity to object.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.