From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AT&T Corp. v. Jackson Utils., LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 4, 2018
No. 17-35592 (9th Cir. Jun. 4, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-35592

06-04-2018

AT&T CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON UTILITIES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00039-BMM-JCL MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana
Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 18, 2018 Portland, Oregon Before: McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. --------

AT&T Corp. appeals the district court's denial of its motion to amend the judgment and the underlying damages award. In particular, AT&T appeals the district court's application of principles of contributory negligence to AT&T's damages award and the denial of prejudgment interest on that award.

The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. Salyers v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 871 F.3d 934, 938 (9th Cir. 2017).

For the reasons set forth in the district court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

AT&T Corp. v. Jackson Utils., LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 4, 2018
No. 17-35592 (9th Cir. Jun. 4, 2018)
Case details for

AT&T Corp. v. Jackson Utils., LLC

Case Details

Full title:AT&T CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON UTILITIES, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 4, 2018

Citations

No. 17-35592 (9th Cir. Jun. 4, 2018)