From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Asrani v. Chertoff

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 14, 2007
Civil No. 07-1673 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Nov. 14, 2007)

Summary

explaining the difference between the discretion to grant or deny relief and the non-discretionary duty to make a decision

Summary of this case from Al Jabari v. Chertoff

Opinion

Civil No. 07-1673 (JRT/FLN).

November 14, 2007

Deepak Gope Asrani, Woodbury, MN, plaintiff pro se.

Erika R. Mozangue, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Minneapolis, MN, for defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 15, 2007, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#4] and Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [#10] are DENIED.


Summaries of

Asrani v. Chertoff

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 14, 2007
Civil No. 07-1673 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Nov. 14, 2007)

explaining the difference between the discretion to grant or deny relief and the non-discretionary duty to make a decision

Summary of this case from Al Jabari v. Chertoff
Case details for

Asrani v. Chertoff

Case Details

Full title:DEEPAK GOPE ASRANI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 14, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-1673 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. Nov. 14, 2007)

Citing Cases

Sharadanant v. Uscis

However, recent opinions the district courts within the Eighth Circuit show a growing tendency to find courts…

Mohammed v. Frazier

In this regard, as Judge Doty succinctly stated in Sun: See Asrani v. Chertoff, 2007 WL 3521366 at *3…