Opinion
1:21-cv-1250 (GLS/DJS)
03-29-2022
ANIBAL ARROYO, Plaintiff, v. JANET YELEN et al.,
ANIBAL ARROYO Pro Se
ORDER
ANIBAL ARROYO Pro Se
GARY L. SHARPE SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report-Recommendation and Order (R&R) by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart, duly filed January 21, 2022 (Dkt. No. 10.) Following fourteen days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.
No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the R&R for clear error, it is hereby
Plaintiff filed a letter stating, among other things, “I object for reasons I comply with Rules.” (Dkt. No. 11.) To the extent that the document can be construed as objections to the R&R, it lacks any argument whatsoever and triggers error for clear error review only. See Almonte v. N.Y. State Div. Of Parole, No. Civ. 904CV484, 2006 WL 149049, at *5-6 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2006).
ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 10) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs amended complaint (Dkt. No. 3) is DISMISSED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to close this case; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk provide a copy of this Order to plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules of Practice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.