From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armenta v. Gipson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 9, 2022
2:22-cv-00737-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00737-WBS-EFB (PC)

11-09-2022

RICHARD ARMENTA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 31, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations

Subsequent to the filing of the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, on September 14, 2022, the court notes that plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, which the court assumes the magistrate judge will screen in due course.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2022, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 2 & 9) are denied.


Summaries of

Armenta v. Gipson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 9, 2022
2:22-cv-00737-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Armenta v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ARMENTA, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 9, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00737-WBS-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2022)