From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arena v. Navarro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 15, 2021
1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC)

09-15-2021

PETER M. ARENA, Plaintiff, v. NAVARRO, et al, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RETURN OVERPAYMENT OF FILING FEES (ECF No. 41)

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Peter M. Arena ("Plaintiff) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiffs first amended complaint against Defendants Medina, Allison, Ramos, Pacheco, and Navarro for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment. (ECF No. 35.)

On September 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion to return overpayment of filing fees. (ECF No. 41.) Defendants have not had an opportunity to file a response, but the Court finds a response unnecessary. The motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(1).

In his motion, Plaintiff states that his aunt, Angela Cotten, paid the remaining filing fee in this action by check. (ECF No. 41.) However, CDCR continues to deduct money from his trust account towards this filing fee, even though it has been paid in full. Plaintiff requests that the Court issue an order notifying the prison trust office to stop deducting money from his account towards the filing fee, and to return any overpaid funds. (Id.)

The motion also states that Ms. Cotten paid the remaining filing fee in Arena v. Cervantes, Case No. 1:21-cv-00928-NONE-BAM. The Court will address the motion by separate order in the other action.

The Court has reviewed the motion and investigated Plaintiffs filing fee balance for this action and confirmed that Plaintiffs filing fee has been paid in full. There is an overpayment which will be refunded next month, and the Court has informed CDCR that Plaintiff has paid his filing fee for this action in full.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for return of overpayment of filing fee, (ECF No. 41), is HEREBY GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arena v. Navarro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 15, 2021
1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Arena v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:PETER M. ARENA, Plaintiff, v. NAVARRO, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00617-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2021)