From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aquavella v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1966
218 N.E.2d 321 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued May 2, 1966

Decided June 2, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, CLARENCE J. HENRY, J.

Vito J. Cassan for appellants-respondents.

John R. Garrity, Corporation Counsel ( Thomas W. Petrillo of counsel), for City of Rochester, respondent-appellant.

Arthur S. Chatman for Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, respondent-appellant.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.


Summaries of

Aquavella v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1966
218 N.E.2d 321 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Aquavella v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:JAMES AQUAVELLA et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. FRANK LAMB et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1966

Citations

218 N.E.2d 321 (N.Y. 1966)
218 N.E.2d 321
271 N.Y.S.2d 280

Citing Cases

Savatgy v. City of Kingston

Section 41 specifically covers only majority votes; to hold that it does not also apply to greater than…

Savatgy v. City of Kingston

To hold that a majority of all of the members is necessary if there is no protest but that only three fourths…