From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Appelbaum v. Appelbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1948
273 App. Div. 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

April 1, 1948.


Order granting defendant's motion to examine plaintiff before trial upon the affirmative defense of condonation and forgiveness in an action for absolute divorce reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. In matrimonial actions we do not approve the granting of orders of examinations before trial which would permit inquiry into and disclosure of the marital relations of the parties. ( Woods v. Woods, 228 App. Div. 842; Immerman v. Immerman, 230 App. Div. 458; Wessel v. Schwarzler, 144 App. Div. 587; Goldberg v. Goldberg, 184 App. Div. 949; Fried v. Fried, 230 App. Div. 708; Safrin v. Safrin, 205 App. Div. 628; Horsch v. Horsch, 206 App. Div. 710; Hutaff v. Hutaff, 208 App. Div. 745. ) The information here sought to be elicited by the examination with respect to item No. 1 can be obtained through a bill of particulars. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Appelbaum v. Appelbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1948
273 App. Div. 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Appelbaum v. Appelbaum

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS APPELBAUM, Appellant, v, FRIEDA APPELBAUM, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Szymanski v. Szymanski

There is no "local rule or decision" prohibiting this examination. Before March 1, 1958, the First Department…

Argondizza v. Argondizza

While the special circumstances in this case warrant an exception to our usual rule against allowing general…