From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fried v. Fried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1930
230 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

June, 1930.


Order denying defendant's motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon the authority of Safrin v. Safrin ( 205 App. Div. 628); Horsch v. Horsch (206 id. 710) and Hutaff v. Hutaff (208 id. 745). Linnekin v. Linnekin ( 96 Misc. 56) is contrary to the weight of authority and should not be followed. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fried v. Fried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1930
230 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Fried v. Fried

Case Details

Full title:ROSE A. FRIED, Respondent, v. SAMUEL D. FRIED, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1930

Citations

230 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Malone v. Malone

November, 1930. Order as resettled, in so far as appealed from, denying defendant's motion to vacate notice…

Kirshner v. Kirshner

Appellant, nevertheless, must satisfactorily prove adultery (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1150). We have heretofore…