From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ankrom v. State (Ex parte Ankrom)

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Dec 13, 2013
143 So. 3d 58 (Ala. 2013)

Summary

applying the plain-meaning rule discussed in DeKalb County LP Gas to define the phrase “a child” found in Ala.Code 1975, § 26–15–3.2

Summary of this case from Christopher v. Christopher (Ex parte Christopher)

Opinion

1110176 and 1110219.

2013-12-13

EX PARTE HOPE ELISABETH ANKROM. (In re Hope Elisabeth Ankrom v. State of Alabama). Ex parte Amanda Helaine Borden Kimbrough. (In re Amanda Helaine Borden Kimbrough v. State of Alabama).


Editor's Note: The opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama, in Ex parte Ankrom, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 143 So.3d 58, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it will be published together with 2011 WL 3781258.


Summaries of

Ankrom v. State (Ex parte Ankrom)

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Dec 13, 2013
143 So. 3d 58 (Ala. 2013)

applying the plain-meaning rule discussed in DeKalb County LP Gas to define the phrase “a child” found in Ala.Code 1975, § 26–15–3.2

Summary of this case from Christopher v. Christopher (Ex parte Christopher)
Case details for

Ankrom v. State (Ex parte Ankrom)

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Hope Elisabeth Ankrom. In re: Hope Elisabeth Ankrom v. State of…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Date published: Dec 13, 2013

Citations

143 So. 3d 58 (Ala. 2013)

Citing Cases

State v. Kelley (In re State)

DeKalb Cnty. LP Gas Co. v. Suburban Gas, Inc., 729 So.2d 270, 275 (Ala.1998) (quoting Blue Cross & Blue…

Christopher v. Christopher (Ex parte Christopher)

729 So.2d at 275–76 (quoting Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Nielsen, 714 So.2d 293, 296 (Ala.1998), additional…