From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2008
2:07-cv-1061-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)

Opinion

2:07-cv-1061-GEB-GGH-P.

May 20, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 26, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Nevertheless, within his putative objections, plaintiff states, inter alia, that he "does not object to the stated named defendants being dismissed without further leave to amend."

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 26, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants D.E. Vandeville, D. Hellwig, J. Owen, D. Peddecord, M. Townsend, R. Kesler, S. Spehling, M. Wright, M. Norgaard, Roche and Tassey are dismissed with prejudice from this action.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2008
2:07-cv-1061-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Anderson v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. TOM FELKER, Warden, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2008

Citations

2:07-cv-1061-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)