From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amundson v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

October, 1926.


Order granting peremptory order of mandamus, as resettled, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and petition for peremptory order of mandamus denied, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that the common council had power to enact the ordinance in question delegating to the superintendent of buildings a legal discretion to grant or withhold a certificate, and that the ordinance passed is sufficient to confer such power. The provisions of section 26 of such ordinance, requiring notice of the application to neighboring property owners, necessarily implies power on the part of the superintendent to exercise such discretion. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

See Yonkers General Ordinance No. 1 of 1921, § 26, being Billboard Ordinance. — [REP.


Summaries of

Amundson v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Amundson v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD C. AMUNDSON, etc., Respondent, v. JAMES W. ARMSTRONG, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1926

Citations

218 App. Div. 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Matter of Moore v. Gallup

( People ex rel. Publicity Leasing Co. v. Ludwig, 218 N.Y. 540, 543; Matter of Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 N.Y.…