Opinion
No. 2:04-CV-01622-GEB-CMK-PS.
February 22, 2006
McGREGOR W. SCOTT, JOHN F. GISLA, SB #42829, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for the United States.
APPLICATION BY DEFENDANT FOR TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER
Plaintiff failed to file a Opposition to Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, however, filed an extensive Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations granting Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment. Since Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are so extensive, Defendant requests additional time in which to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Objections.
Plaintiff's objections were filed in two blue folders, and it was not immediately apparent that the filing contained objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the request for an extension of time to respond was docketed before plaintiff's objections. The objections consist of fifteen pages of written objections and twenty-one attached exhibits, which were lodged with the court.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that he have until February 27, 2006 to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing Application, and for good cause, Defendant has until February 27, 2006 to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.