From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Reilly

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 2008
289 F. App'x 268 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-55679.

Submitted August 11, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 19, 2008.

Michael E. Allen, Calipatria, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02331-JLS-CAB.

Before: CANBY, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication arid is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


A review of the record, appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, and appellant's opening brief, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Allen v. Reilly

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 19, 2008
289 F. App'x 268 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Allen v. Reilly

Case Details

Full title:Michael E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy J. REILLY, Deputy Public…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

289 F. App'x 268 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Allen v. Reilly

Michael E. ALLEN, petitioner, v. Timothy J. REILLY.Case below, 289 Fed.Appx. 268. Petition for writ of…