From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Algonquin Steel Technologies v. Conn. Compressed Gas

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 25, 2000
743 A.2d 613 (Conn. 2000)

Opinion

(SC 16101)

Argued November 30, 1999

Officially released January 25, 2000

Procedural History

Application by the plaintiff to confirm an arbitration award, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Danbury, where the defendant filed an application to vacate the award, and tried to the court, Nadeau, J.; judgment confirming the award; thereafter, the court, Rogers, J., denied the defendant's application for discharge of judgment lien and its motion to vacate and/or modify the bank execution on the judgment, from which the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, Foti, Hennessy and Sullivan, Js., which dismissed the defendant's appeal, and the defendant, on the granting of certification, appealed to this court. Dismissed.

Theodore R. Tyma, with whom was Stephen F. Donahue, for the appellant (defendant).

Christopher W. Huck, for the appellee (plaintiff).


Opinion


After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant's appeal?" Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc., 248 Conn. 919, 734 A.2d 565 (1999).


Summaries of

Algonquin Steel Technologies v. Conn. Compressed Gas

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 25, 2000
743 A.2d 613 (Conn. 2000)
Case details for

Algonquin Steel Technologies v. Conn. Compressed Gas

Case Details

Full title:ALGONQUIN STEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CONNECTICUT COMPRESSED GAS, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 25, 2000

Citations

743 A.2d 613 (Conn. 2000)
743 A.2d 613