From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alfonso v. Metro. Transit Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2013
103 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-26

Drucilla ALFONSO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant, New York City Transit Authority, Defendant–Appellant.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellant. Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C., New York (Brian J. Shoot of counsel), for respondent.



Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellant. Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C., New York (Brian J. Shoot of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, FREEDMAN, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered July 25, 2011, upon a jury verdict, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarding plaintiff $450,000 for past pain and suffering and $800,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a 52–year–old office worker, fractured her right wrist, and injured her neck and right shoulder, after she was struck by a truck owned by the Transit Authority, and operated by an Authority track worker. Plaintiff sustained a comminuted intra-articular fracture of the distal radial metaphysis of her right wrist, and a cervical herniated disc. A closed reduction was performed in efforts to repair the wrist. When that failed, an open reduction surgery was performed with internal fixation (a plate and screws), which will remain in the wrist permanently. She underwent physical therapy for three months for her wrist, and an additional six months for her shoulder. Plaintiff was left with reduced ranges of motion, continued pain, and progressive arthritis in her wrist.

The jury's award for $450,000 for past pain and suffering and $800,000 for future pain and suffering did not deviate materially from reasonable compensation under the circumstances ( see Diouf v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 A.D.3d 600, 909 N.Y.S.2d 451 [1st Dept. 2010]; Ramos v. City of New York, 68 A.D.3d 632, 891 N.Y.S.2d 385 [1st Dept. 2009]; Hayes v. Normandie LLC, 306 A.D.2d 133, 761 N.Y.S.2d 645 [1st Dept. 2003], lv. dismissed100 N.Y.2d 640, 769 N.Y.S.2d 204, 801 N.E.2d 425 [2003];Cabezas v. City of New York, 303 A.D.2d 307, 756 N.Y.S.2d 566 [1st Dept. 2003]; CPLR 5501[c] ).


Summaries of

Alfonso v. Metro. Transit Auth.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 26, 2013
103 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Alfonso v. Metro. Transit Auth.

Case Details

Full title:Drucilla ALFONSO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

103 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
962 N.Y.S.2d 69
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1198

Citing Cases

Vesely v. Long Island R.R. Co.

The cases cited by Vesely are inapposite, as they involved additional non-wrist or non-shoulder injuries,…

Hamer v. City of N.Y.

Given the injury and its sequella, the jury's pain and suffering awards deviate materially from reasonable…