Summary
In Cabezas v. City of New York, 756 N.Y.S.2d 566 (1st Dep't 2003) the Appellate Division upheld an award of $450,000 for past pain and suffering and $450,000 for future pain and suffering to a plaintiff who "suffered a comminuted intra-articular distal radius fracture and displaced ulna styloid fracture" after falling on a sidewalk, requiring two surgeries and resulting in limited wrist motion and limited grip strength.
Summary of this case from Adebiyi v. Yankee Fiber Control, Inc.Opinion
514
March 25, 2003.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered on or about October 17, 2001, which directed a new trial on damages unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the jury's awards for past pain and suffering from $450,000 to $150,000, future pain and suffering from $450,000 to $175,000, past medical expenses from $50,000 to $28,000, and future medical expenses from $60,000 to $44,000, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, to reinstate the jury awards, except that for future medical expenses, which plaintiff has agreed to reduce to $50,000.
Brian J. Isaac, for plaintiff-respondent.
Stacy Laine Matthews, for defendant-respondent.
Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin, Williams, JJ.
Plaintiff, who is right-handed, broke his right wrist when he fell on a sidewalk. He suffered a comminuted intra-articular distal radius fracture and displaced ulnus styloid fracture, and underwent two operations, one of which involved external fixation. He has limited wrist motion and limited grip strength in his right hand, cannot carry anything heavy, has difficulty grabbing or holding small objects, buttoning his shirt and combing his hair, cannot wash dishes or sweep the floor, and can no longer swim or play softball or basketball. He suffers constant pain that will require a future wrist fusion operation, which will eliminate all motion in his wrist and may have other adverse effects.
We note defendant's failure to contravene plaintiff's medical evidence with expert evidence of its own (see Roux v. Caiola, 254 A.D.2d 182, 183, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 803), and find that neither the award of $450,000 for past pain and suffering nor that of $450,000 for 23 years of future pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation (CPLR 5501[c]; cf. Valentine v. Lopez, 283 A.D.2d 739, 743-744). The trial court's reduction of the award for past medical expenses to $28,000 was apparently based on the amounts that plaintiff owes Lincoln Hospital and Dr. Kaplan. However, plaintiff also owes money to Metropolitan Hospital, whose records were received in evidence. Hence, there is evidence to support the jury's award of $50,000 for past medical expenses. The trial evidence supports a reduction of the jury's award for future medical expenses from $60,000 to $50,000, as plaintiff concedes.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.