From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Brown

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 20, 2024
8:23-cv-00274-JFW-SHK (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-00274-JFW-SHK

03-20-2024

JAMES DANIEL ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. JERRY BROWN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, the the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the findings in the R&R are ACCEPTED; (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; and (3) Plaintiff must effectuate service in accordance with the R&R within 30 days of the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Brown

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 20, 2024
8:23-cv-00274-JFW-SHK (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Alexander v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DANIEL ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. JERRY BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 20, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-00274-JFW-SHK (C.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2024)

Citing Cases

Ward v. Stanislaus

Jackson suggests “a state official sued in their official capacity could be considered a ‘public entity' and…