From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ahferom v. Dormitory Authority of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2001
282 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

April 19, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered October 31, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Dormitory Authority's motion to strike and granted plaintiff's cross motion to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Michael Villeck, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Haydn J. Brill, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


Where, as here, the delay is relatively short, and the public entity opposing late notice makes no showing of resultant prejudice, the grant of leave to file a late notice of claim constitutes a proper exercise of discretion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (see,Matter of Thornhill v. New York City Hous. Auth., 232 A.D.2d 317; Matter of Rivas v. New York City Hous. Auth., 188 A.D.2d 390). Defendant-appellant's claim that the motion court was without jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's cross motion is plainly without merit (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Ahferom v. Dormitory Authority of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 2001
282 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Ahferom v. Dormitory Authority of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:TSEHAI AHFEROM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. THE DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 367

Citing Cases

In Matter of P.I. v. New York City Bd. of Educ.

xual assault) and for his two grandchildren, and his lack of knowledge of the statutory time limits for…

Bennett v. Mele

In this case, the prescribed 90-day period expired on February 16, 2001, and the motion seeking leave to…