From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rivas v. New York City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1992
188 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 15, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.).


The instant application was made within 30 days after expiration of the 90-day time limit, and alleges that petitioner fell outside her apartment door as a result of respondent's negligence in maintaining the hallway. In exercising their broad discretion under General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) to grant leave to file a late notice of claim, the courts consider all relevant factors, including the length of the delay. Where, as here, the delay is relatively short, and the municipality cannot show prejudice, it is not an abuse of discretion to grant leave (see, Matter of Sutton v Town of Schuyler Falls, 185 A.D.2d 430).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Rivas v. New York City Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1992
188 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Rivas v. New York City Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANA RIVAS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 384

Citing Cases

In Matter of P.I. v. New York City Bd. of Educ.

at ignorance of the law, and of the statutory notice of claim requirement pursuant to GML § 50-e, does not…

Bennett v. Mele

In this case, the prescribed 90-day period expired on February 16, 2001, and the motion seeking leave to…