Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A91-533-240.
Robert A. Espinoza, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, and Edward C. Durant, Esq., DOJ--U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: BRIGHT, O'SCANNLAIN, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Myron H. Bright, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
The record confirms that, before his trip to Mexico, Aguilar received notice that the
Page 601.
INS had issued a final denial of his application for temporary resident status. Aguilar was not granted advance parole and later attempted to reenter the United States with an invalid entry document. The INS properly placed Aguilar in exclusion proceedings. See Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 28, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.