From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.D.M. Productions v. Solomon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 25, 2003
847 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-701.

Opinion filed June 25, 2003.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 02-8722.

McClosky, D'Anna, Ioannou Dieterle, LLP, and Gordon A. Dieterle, and David J. Pascuzzi (Boca Raton), for appellant.

Jennifer G. Herskowitz, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.


Pursuant to our previous mandate in A.D.M. Prods., Inc. v. Solomon, 831 So.2d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), the trial court conducted a Kinney hearing on the appellant's motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens and denied the same. On this appeal, on the record before us, we cannot find that the denial of the motion was an abuse of discretion. See Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.061(a); Ira Mex, Inc. v. Southeastern Interior Constr., Inc., 777 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (decision to grant or deny motion to dismiss from inconvenient forum rests in sound discretion of trial court, subject to review for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the same.

See Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont'l Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla. 1996).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

A.D.M. Productions v. Solomon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 25, 2003
847 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

A.D.M. Productions v. Solomon

Case Details

Full title:A.D.M. PRODUCTIONS, INC. Appellant, v. DAVID SOLOMON, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 25, 2003

Citations

847 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)