From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Addison v. Cal. Inst. for Men

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2018
No. 17-55732 (9th Cir. Apr. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-55732

04-23-2018

JOSEPH D. ADDISON III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR MEN; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 5:15-cv-01259-JVS-AJW MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Joseph D. Addison III, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his post-judgment motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Addison's motion for reconsideration because Addison failed to establish any basis for such relief. See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Addison v. Cal. Inst. for Men

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2018
No. 17-55732 (9th Cir. Apr. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Addison v. Cal. Inst. for Men

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. ADDISON III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2018

Citations

No. 17-55732 (9th Cir. Apr. 23, 2018)