From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Acosta v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Mar 11, 2022
No. 5D21-1673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

5D21-1673

03-11-2022

EDWIN ACOSTA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge. LT Case No. 05-2019-CF-050705-A

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders case, we affirm Appellant's judgement and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the $3.00 cost imposed in error under section 318.18, Florida Statutes (2019), as Appellant was not charged with a traffic infraction. See Sorenson v. State, 291 So.3d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

AFFIRMED, and REMANDED with Instructions.

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur


Summaries of

Acosta v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Mar 11, 2022
No. 5D21-1673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Acosta v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN ACOSTA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

No. 5D21-1673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2022)