From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

3M Co. v. Phx. Auto. Refinishing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2018
CV No. 17-00649-RSWL-DTB (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018)

Opinion

CV No. 17-00649-RSWL-DTB

04-25-2018

3M COMPANY; and 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. PHOENIX AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING CO., LTD.; and K2 CONCEPTS, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, on April 27, 2017, this Court entered the Consent Judgment against Defendant K2 Concepts [18],

WHEREAS, on January 8, 2018, the Court Clerk entered default against Defendant Phoenix Automotive Refinishing Co., Ltd. ("Phoenix") [26], pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a),

WHEREAS, this Court GRANTED Plaintiffs 3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company's (collectively, "3M") Motion for Default Judgment [28],

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of 3M and against Phoenix, in accordance with this Court's previous Order granting 3M's Motion for Default Judgment. Nominal damages are awarded to 3M in the amount of $1.00. Attorneys' fees are further awarded to 3M in the amount of $65,637.00. The Court also awards costs to 3M in the amount of $10,515.39.

Furthermore, the Court GRANTS 3M's request for entry of a permanent injunction, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Phoenix, its agents, servants, and employees, and all persons in active concert and participation with Phoenix who receive actual notice of the injunction are permanently enjoined from:

(1) Infringing upon 3M's copyrights, including Copyright No. VA 2-020-468;

(2) Directly or indirectly manufacturing, purchasing, importing, exporting, advertising, promoting, offering to sell, selling, distributing, transferring, concealing, or otherwise disposing of any products bearing 3M's registered trademarks, including, but not limited to Registration Nos. 2,861,036 and 4,156,991, and any colorable imitation thereof; and

(3) Effectuating assignments or transfers, forming
new entities or associations, or utilizing any device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the terms of this Order or aiding, abetting, contributing to, or otherwise assisting anyone in infringing upon 3M's copyrights or trademarks.

As no Defendants remain, the case is dismissed and the Clerk shall close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 25, 2018

s/ RONALD S.W.LEW

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW

Senior U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

3M Co. v. Phx. Auto. Refinishing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2018
CV No. 17-00649-RSWL-DTB (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018)
Case details for

3M Co. v. Phx. Auto. Refinishing Co.

Case Details

Full title:3M COMPANY; and 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. PHOENIX…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2018

Citations

CV No. 17-00649-RSWL-DTB (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Violet Energy, Inc.

(2)] . . . ‘[w]here the [p]laintiff's complaint is well-pleaded and the defendant makes no effort to properly…

WB Music Corp. v. Harvey

“Where the [p]laintiff's complaint is well-pleaded and the defendant makes no effort to properly respond, the…