From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

2001 Commerce Street v. Star Enterprise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2003
306 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03768

Argued June 3, 2003.

June 23, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered March 28, 2002, as denied those branches of its motion which were for leave to amend its complaint to include causes of action to recover damages for fraud and violation of the Town of Yorktown Code, and for punitive damages.

Daniels and Porco, LLP, Carmel, N.Y. (Robert C. Lusardi of counsel), for appellant.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran Arnold, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Eric M. Kraus and Howard R. Cohen of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to amend the complaint to include a cause of action to recover damages for fraud, as it was time-barred (see CPLR 203[f], [g]; 213[8]; Prestandrea v. Stein, 262 A.D.2d 621).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

2001 Commerce Street v. Star Enterprise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2003
306 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

2001 Commerce Street v. Star Enterprise

Case Details

Full title:2001 COMMERCE STREET CORP., appellant, v. STAR ENTERPRISE, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 493

Citing Cases

Feldman v. 3588 Nostrand Ave. LLC

The party seeking a contempt order must prove actual loss, failing which "the court may only impose a fine…