From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

1st Technology, LLC v. Rational Enterprises Ltda.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 21, 2008
Case No.: 2:06-cv-01110-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:06-cv-01110-RLH-GWF.

November 21, 2008


ORDER


Before this Court is the Order and Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#170), filed July 29, 2008, entered by the Honorable George W. Foley regarding Plaintiff's motion for sanctions and for an order to show cause to hold defendants in contempt and renewed request for sanction against counsel for Defendants (#149). Defendants filed a motion for magistrate judge to reconsider (#177), and an Objection (#179) in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, both on August 14, 2008. Plaintiff filed its responses to the motion for reconsideration (#180) and the Objection (#181) on August 29, 2008. Judge Foley granted in part Defendants' motion for reconsideration on October 21, 2008, and modified the Order and Findings and Recommendation by striking that part of the recommendation that Defendants be required to show cause why they should not be held in criminal contempt. ( See Dkt. #186.) Defendants have filed no new objection to the Amended Order and Findings and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the amended Order and Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge should be accepted and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Order and Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#170, as amended by #186) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.


Summaries of

1st Technology, LLC v. Rational Enterprises Ltda.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 21, 2008
Case No.: 2:06-cv-01110-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2008)
Case details for

1st Technology, LLC v. Rational Enterprises Ltda.

Case Details

Full title:1ST TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. RATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTDA., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Nov 21, 2008

Citations

Case No.: 2:06-cv-01110-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2008)

Citing Cases

United States v. Underhill

The scope of post-judgment discovery is broad and the judgment-creditor is permitted to make a broad inquiry…

Trs. of the Constr. Indus. v. Demo & Doors Enters.

The scope of post-judgment discovery is broad and the judgment-creditor is permitted to make a broad inquiry…