Yash R. Patel, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 29, 2004
01A42276 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 29, 2004)

01A42276

06-29-2004

Yash R. Patel, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.


Yash R. Patel v. United States Postal Service

01A42276

June 29, 2004

.

Yash R. Patel,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A42276

Agency No. 4H-300-0315-01

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal from a final agency decision

(FAD) concerning his consolidated complaints of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq.<1> The appeal is accepted pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

For the following reasons, the Commission VACATES and REMANDS this case

for further processing.

The record reveals that during the relevant time, complainant was

employed as a Mail Processor, Grade Level 4, at the agency's General

Mail Facility. Complainant sought EEO counseling and subsequently

filed a formal complaint on September 28, 2001, alleging that he was

discriminated against on the bases of race (Indian), national origin

(Indian), sex (male), religion (Hindu), color (not specified), age

(D.O.B. October 8, 1956), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity<2> when:

(1) Since April 2001 and before, complainant had not been given

opportunities for higher level assignments;

(2) Complainant was subjected to violent behavior by co-workers; and,

On June 8, 2001, complainant's request for a revised schedule was denied.

Complainant prematurely requested a hearing, and on January 23, 2002, an

EEOC Administrative Judge dismissed the hearing request indicating that

complainant could resubmit his request after the expiration of 180 days.

There is no evidence to suggest that complainant did so. Despite that

it is the agency's burden pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108(f) to ensure

that such information is timely furnished to the complainant, in its FAD,

the agency admits that it is uncertain as to whether complainant ever

received a copy of the report of investigation (ROI) and the right to

request a hearing within thirty days of receipt of the ROI. The agency

issued a FAD on January 22, 2004 finding that the complainant failed

to establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the bases of race,

color, religion, sex, national origin, age discrimination, or reprisal.

The Commission notes that even if the ROI was received by complainant,

the investigation was woefully inadequate. We first note that the

record lacks any information as to the similarly situated employees whom

complainant claims were treated more favorably than he was. The names

of such individuals were specifically stated in the EEO Counselor's

report as well as in complainant's affidavit. Furthermore, the file

lacked the affidavits of other relevant individuals. Specifically, the

affidavit of the Manager of Distribution Operations is absent from the

investigatory file because she did not submit the requested material.

Likewise, no affidavit was solicited from the supervisor who allegedly

had authority regarding higher level assignments.

It is the agency's responsibility to develop an impartial and appropriate

factual record that allows a reasonable fact-finder to draw conclusions

as to whether discrimination occurred. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108(b); see

also EEOC Management Directive 110, November 9, 1999 (EEO MD-110) at

Chapter 6. We find that because of the cited deficiencies noted above,

the record is inadequately developed to make a determination on the merits

of complainant's claim. Therefore, after a careful review of the record,

we VACATE the final agency decision and REMAND this matter to the agency

for a supplemental investigation consistent with the ORDER below.

ORDER

On remand, the agency is ordered to conduct a supplemental investigation,

which shall include the following actions:

The agency shall supplement the record with affidavits and documentation

regarding similarly situated employees whom complainant alleges were

treated more favorably than he was. The agency shall also provide

documentation and witness affidavits regarding the violent behavior

alleged by complainant. The agency shall further supplement the record

with affidavits from all agency officials responsible for the decisions

to deny complainant advancement opportunities and a revised schedule,

detailing the reasons behind such decisions and specifying agency actions

in comparative situations against other similarly situated employees

during the relevant time period.

2. The agency shall ensure that the investigator obtain any other

affidavits, records or statistics not specifically requested in this

Order, and not inconsistent with this decision, which may be relevant

in determining the merits of complainant's complaint.

3. The agency shall ensure that the investigator completes a supplemental

investigation within sixty (60) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final. The agency shall issue complainant a copy of the Report

of Investigation, including the matters included in the supplemental

investigation. The agency shall notify complainant that within thirty

(30) calendar days of receipt of the Report of Investigation, he has

the right to request a hearing and decision from an EEOC Administrative

Judge or may request an immediate final decision pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.110.

The agency shall issue a compliance report as referenced immediately

below. This report must include a copy of the supplemental investigative

report and either complainant's request for a hearing, or the agency's

final action.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be

filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30)

calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar

days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 29, 2004

__________________

Date

1Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.606, the agency

consolidated Agency Case Nos. 4-H-300-0315-01 and 4-H-300-03160-01 into

the instant agency number, 4H-300-0315-01, for joint processing.

2The record indicates, and the agency does not dispute, that complainant

participated in prior protected activity, but it is unclear under which

statutes such activity arose.