Wyatt Brownlee, Complainant,v.William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 28, 2001
05a01041 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 28, 2001)

05a01041

03-28-2001

Wyatt Brownlee, Complainant, v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration Agency.


Wyatt Brownlee v. Social Security Administration

05A01041

03-28-01

.

Wyatt Brownlee,

Complainant,

v.

William A. Halter,

Acting Commissioner,

Social Security Administration

Agency.

Request No. 05A01041

Appeal No. 01A03313

Agency No. 000112SSA

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Wyatt

Brownlee v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01A03313

(June 28, 2000). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in

its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In complainant's request for reconsideration, he informs the Commission

that he has been on the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJs) eligibility

register since 1984, not 1994 as the previous decision states.<1>

Complainant also informs the Commission that he is still on the ALJ

eligibility register.<2> However, the record indicates that the last

official selection made from the ALJ eligibility register was in 1994. As

noted in the prior decision, complainant did not contact an EEO Counselor

until April 21, 1999. Given the five years between the last selection

made off this register and complainant's contact with an EEO Counselor,

we find that complainant should have suspected discrimination well before

April 1999. After carefully reviewing and considering complainant's

request for reconsideration, the previous decision, and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request.

The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A03313 remains the Commission's

final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on

the decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__03-28-01________________

Date

1 The Commission cited the 1994 date based on information submitted by

complainant in his statement on appeal in the previous decision.

2 The record shows that complainant specifically informed the EEO

Counselor that he has not been on the ALJ eligibility register for

several years because he has not updated his application as required.