Wilson P. Philip, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 13, 2002
01A20010_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 13, 2002)

01A20010_r

08-13-2002

Wilson P. Philip, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Wilson P. Philip v. United States Postal Service

01A20010

August 13, 2002

.

Wilson P. Philip,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A20010

Agency No. 1G-753-0084-98

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency improperly dismissed

complainant's complaint in its decision dated October 18, 2001, when

it implemented the Order of Dismissal issued by the EEOC Administrative

Judge (AJ) on August 31, 2001. In complainant's complaint, dated June

30, 1998, complainant claimed that he was discriminated against on the

bases of race (Mongoloid), national origin (Asian Indian) and disability

(neck and back injury) when:

On February 11, 1997, complainant was placed �off the clock;�

On April 3, 1997, complainant was issued a notice of removal; and

On March 3, 1998, complainant's termination was upheld following an

arbitration hearing.

The Commission issued a decision on Appeal Number 01990115, Agency Number

1G-753-0084-98, on November 22, 1999. In that decision, involving the

same claims of discrimination as in the instant case, the issue on appeal

was whether complainant contacted the EEO Counselor in a timely manner.

In that decision, the Commission reversed the agency's decision and

found that �[b]ecause the agency never provided any evidence concerning

whether complainant knew or should have known of the time limitations,

we find that the agency failed to support its decision to dismiss the

complaint on timeliness grounds.�

In the AJ's Order of Dismissal in the instant case, the AJ stated, �On

February 1, 2001, I issued an Order To Show Cause why the referenced

complaint should not be dismissed as untimely filed. Complainant

initially represented that he was unaware of Commission time frames when

he filed

the complaint in 1998. Investigation reveals that in 1996 complainant

also filed a complaint which would have made him aware of the time

frames.� It is unclear from this Order whether the AJ found that

complainant did not initiate contact with the EEO Counselor within

the limitation period, or, whether complainant did not file his formal

complaint within the limitation period. A review of the record, however,

shows that in complainant's June 30, 1998 complaint, the time frame

which complainant claims that he lacked constructive knowledge was the

time frame for contacting an EEO Counselor.

In Appeal Number 01990115, the Commission reversed the agency's decision

that complainant's contact with the EEO Counselor was untimely because the

agency presented no evidence of constructive knowledge of the limitation

period. Additionally, even if the Commission were to revisit the matter

of complainant's timeliness regarding contact with an EEO Counselor, or

the timely filing of the formal complaint, the mere filing of a previous

complaint is not sufficient in this case to demonstrate constructive

knowledge of the limitation periods.

The record also shows that complainant received the notice of right

to file a formal complaint on June 30, 1998, and, complainant's formal

complaint is dated June 30, 1998. The notice indicated that complainant

had to file a formal complaint within fifteen (15) calendar days of its

receipt. There is no postmark in the record indicating the date on which

complainant's complaint was filed; however, the agency bears the burden

of presenting sufficient information to support a reasoned determination

regarding timeliness. The Commission finds that complainant's formal

complaint was timely filed.

The agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint is REVERSED.

We REMAND the complaint for further processing in accordance with the

Order below.

ORDER

The agency is directed to submit a copy of the complaint file to the

appropriate EEOC Hearings Unit within fifteen (15) calendar days of

the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall provide written

notification to the Compliance Officer at the address set forth below that

the complaint file has been transmitted to the Hearings Unit. Thereafter,

the Administrative Judge shall issue a decision on the complaint in

accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109 and the agency shall issue a final

action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.110.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all

submissions to the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the

Commission's order, the complainant may petition the Commission for

enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant

also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance

with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative

petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29

C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to

file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the

paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil

action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated

in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant

files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint,

including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 13, 2002

__________________

Date