0120110432
04-05-2011
William W. Thomas, Complainant, v. Robert C. Tapella, Public Printer, United States Government Printing Office, Agency.
William W. Thomas,
Complainant,
v.
Robert C. Tapella,
Public Printer,
United States Government Printing Office,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120110432
Agency No. 1040
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's
decision (Decision) dated September 27, 2010, dismissing his complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked
as a Clamp Truck Operator at the Agency's Paper Warehouse facility in
Washington DC. On June 30, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint
alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis
of race (African-American) when:
1. On or about July 1, 2010, Complainant did not receive a performance
award.
The Agency dismissed the claim for untimely EEO Counselor contact.
Specifically, the Agency found that Complainant was not entitled to
the award because of the rating he received in his 2009 performance
evaluation, which he received on June, 25, 2009. The Agency determined
that Complainant was aware of the performance evaluation on that date and
further, that he had constructive knowledge that he would not receive
an award on that date. Therefore, the Agency concluded, his April 27,
2010 EEO Counselor contact was untimely because it occurred more than 45
days after June 25, 2009. On appeal, Complainant argues the merits of his
complaint but does not address the Agency's argument that his Counselor
contact was untimely. The Agency requests that we affirm its Decision
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of
discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment
Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the
matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel
action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.
The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed
to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)
day limitation period is triggered. See Howard v. Department of the Navy,
EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation
is not triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination,
but before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have
become apparent.
EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend
the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the
time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know
and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or
personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented
by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within
the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency
or the Commission.
The Agency contends that Complainant's Counselor contact was untimely
because he received his performance evaluation in July 2009 but did not
contact a Counselor until April 2010. We note, however, that Complainant
is not complaining about his 2009 evaluation, he is complaining about
not being given a performance award in 2010. In his Informal Complaint,
Complainant states that he became aware of the alleged discrimination on
or about April 20101. We therefore find that his April 27, 2010 Counselor
contact was timely. With regard to the Agency's argument that he did not
receive the award because of his 2009 performance evaluation, we note
that such an argument addresses the merits of the complaint without a
proper investigation, as required by the regulations. Such an argument
is inappropriate at this stage and is irrelevant to the issue of whether
or not Complainant's Counselor contact was timely. We further note that
even assuming Complainant was aware that he would not be receiving an
award before the awards were distributed, had he filed a complaint at
that time he faced the prospect of the complaint being dismissed under
29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) for addressing a proposed action. Because we
find Complainant's Counselor contact was timely, we REVERSE the Agency's
Decision and REMAND the matter back to the Agency for further processing
in accordance with the ORDER below.
ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue
to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar
days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall
be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,
DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation,
and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant.
If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant
may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action
to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following
an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,
1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant
has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in
accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil
Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).
If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of
the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive
for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)
This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date
you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant
in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29
U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the
sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the
Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
April 5, 2011
__________________
Date
1 We note that in his Formal Complaint, Complainant states that the
discriminatory act took place on July 1, 2010.
??
??
??
??
2
0120110432
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120110432