0120112064
07-22-2011
William C. Hogan, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.
William C. Hogan,
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Southeast Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120112064
Agency No. 4H300006911
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's
decision dated January 27, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Section
501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,
29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Upon review, the
Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was properly dismissed
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked
as a Letter Carrier at the Agency’s Cumberland Carrier Facility
in Atlanta, Georgia. On January 6, 2011, Complainant filed a formal
complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on
the bases of disability (OCD/ADHP), age (65), and reprisal for prior
protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
when (1) on October 15, 2010, he told his manager he was having a panic
attack and headed to the manager’s office, but the manager told him
to calm down in the custodian’s room instead; (2) on the same date
he called the postmaster to complain about the above incident, but the
postmaster did not return his call; and (3) on December 7, 2010, his
supervisor failed to make a weekly check of the weeks he was charged
leave to advise him of the type of leave that was inputted. Complainant
stated he was on leave December 7, 2010 through January 4, 2011, but the
supervisor did not advise him concerning his leave. Complainant did not
allege that he was denied leave or that the leave was inputted wrongly.
The Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, noting
that it did not rise to the level of harassment and that Complainant
was not disciplined and suffered no harm or loss of wages. The instant
appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Under the regulations set forth at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614, an agency
shall accept a complaint from an aggrieved employee or applicant for
employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by
that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or
disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's
federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee"
as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term,
condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.
Diaz v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April
21, 1994). If Complainant cannot establish that s/he is aggrieved,
the agency shall dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim.
The Commission has held that where, as here, a complaint does not
challenge an agency action or inaction regarding a specific term,
condition, or privilege of employment, the claim of harassment may
survive if it alleges conduct that is sufficiently severe or pervasive
to alter the conditions of the complainant’s employment. See Harris
v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 23 (1993). The Commission
finds that Complainant’s allegations, even if proven true, concern
events that are insufficient to state a viable claim of a hostile work
environment. Complainant has not shown how he was harmed by recovering
in a custodian’s office instead of a supervisor’s office, or how
the supervisor’s failure to inform him of the leave inputted impacted
on his leave usage.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's
complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive
for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency
head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full
name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal
of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a
civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits
as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
July 22, 2011
__________________
Date
2
0120112064
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120112064