Wendell P. Tyler, Petitioner,v.Kay Coles James Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 4, 2003
03A20090_r (E.E.O.C. Mar. 4, 2003)

03A20090_r

03-04-2003

Wendell P. Tyler, Petitioner, v. Kay Coles James Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.


Wendell P. Tyler v. Office of Personnel Management

03A20090

March 4, 2003

.

Wendell P. Tyler,

Petitioner,

v.

Kay Coles James

Director,

Office of Personnel Management,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A20090

MSPB No. CH-844E-02-0087-I-1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

Petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit Systems

Protection Board (MSPB) dated July 18, 2002. On November 21, 1995, the

agency found petitioner disabled for his position of Postal Service Clerk

due to a psychiatric condition. On March 17, 2001, petitioner requested

that the agency find him recovered from his disability. The agency, on

March 31, 2001, found him recovered. Complainant, on April 13, 2001,

requested reconsideration of the agency's decision. On September 27,

2001, the agency issued a decision finding him recovered and found

that he was no longer eligible for continued disability payments.

Complainant appealed that decision to the MSPB, and as a remedy,

requested reinstatement arguing that his removal was invalid since he is

now considered recovered. The MSPB issued an initial decision on April

22, 2002 dismissing the appeal for failure to state a cause of action

for which relief may be granted. Specifically, the MSPS found that the

finding of petitioner to be recovered does not invalidate prior decisions

of the MSPB or agency, which previously addressed the issue of removal.

On July 18, 2002, the MSPB issued a Final Order denying petitioner's

petition for review of the April 22, 2002 decision. Petitioner now

petitions to the Commission from the MSPB's July 18, 2002 decision.<1>

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission has no jurisdiction over matters decided

by the MSPB, as is the case here, where there are no discrimination

claims within the Commission's jurisdiction addressed by the MSPB.

A determination as to whether petitioner is recovered and is no longer

eligible for continued disability payments is not a basis over which the

Commission has jurisdiction. Because the MSPB decision did not address

any matters within the Commission's jurisdiction, the Commission has no

jurisdiction to review petitioner's case. Consequently, the Commission

denies consideration of the petition for review.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 4, 2003

__________________

Date

1The Commission notes that petitioner was

not given appeal rights to the EEOC from either MSPB decision.