Wendell P. Tyler, Petitioner,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 25, 2002
03A20040 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 25, 2002)

03A20040

04-25-2002

Wendell P. Tyler, Petitioner, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Wendell P. Tyler v. United States Postal Service

Petition No. 03A20040

April 25, 2002

.

Wendell P. Tyler,

Petitioner,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A20040

MSPB No. CH-3443-01-0135-I-1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

The petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board) dated January 10, 2002.

The issue presented is whether the petitioner's petition should be denied

for lack of jurisdiction.

The petitioner filed an appeal with the MSPB challenging a variety of

actions. In its initial decision the MSPB denied portions of the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction, and the remaining portion on the grounds of

collateral estoppel and res judicata. The petitioner filed a petition

with the MSPB to review the initial decision, which was denied. In its

final decision the Board reopened the initial decision on its own motion

to address some of the petitioner's arguments, but reached the same

legal conclusions of the initial decision. Neither the MSPB's initial

or final decisions contained review rights to the EEOC. Nevertheless,

the petitioner filed a petition for review with the EEOC.

EEOC regulations 29 C.F.R. � 1614.304 and .305 provide that the EEOC

may review determinations on claims of discrimination which are raised

in connection with an action that is appealable to the MSPB. The MSPB,

however, made no such determinations. Instead, it found that it lacked

jurisdiction on certain claims and the remaining claims were subject to

collateral estoppel and res judicata. For this reason, the Commission

denies the petitioner's petition for review.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 25, 2002

__________________

Date