Victor A. Allen Petitioner,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 16, 2001
03a10052 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 16, 2001)

03a10052

03-16-2001

Victor A. Allen Petitioner, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Victor A. Allen v. USPS

03A10052

March 16, 2001

.

Victor A. Allen

Petitioner,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A10052

MSPB No. AT-0752-99-0857-I-1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

On February 20, 2001, Victor A. Allen (hereinafter referred to as

petitioner) filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) regarding the Merit Systems Protection Board's (MSPB

or the Board) final decision on his case.

Petitioner, a Part-Time Letter Carrier, filed an appeal with the MSPB

alleging religious discrimination when he was removed from his position

for failure to meet the attendance requirements of his position. The

MSPB dismissed the appeal because petitioner was not a veteran with

preference eligible status. The MSPB did not address petitioner's

claims of discrimination and the decision to dismiss was upheld by

the full Board in a decision dated July 17, 2000. The Board did not

give petitioner appeal rights to the Commission. Petitioner then filed

with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal

No. 00-3422. In a decision dated February 8, 2001, the court affirmed

the MSPB's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

When the MSPB has denied jurisdiction in such matters, the Commission

has held that there is little point in continuing to view the matter as a

"mixed case" as defined by 29 C.F.R. �1614.302(a). Thus, the case will be

considered a "non-mixed" matter and processed accordingly. See generally

Schmitt v. Department of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. 01902126 (July

9, 1990); Phillips v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05900883

(October 12, 1990). Petition No. 03A10052 hereby is administratively

closed, and the matter is referred to the agency for further processing

as outlined below.<1>

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Petitioner is advised that by operation of 29 C.F.R. �1614.302(b), the

agency is required to process his allegations of discrimination as a

"non-mixed" matter pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.105 et seq. The agency

shall notify the petitioner of the right to contact an EEO counselor

within forty-five (45) days of receipt of this decision, and to file an

EEO complaint, subject to �1614.107. The date on which the petitioner

filed the appeal with the MSPB shall be deemed the date of initial

contact with the EEO counselor. Petitioner shall have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court, based on

the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date that this decision is received.

STATEMENT OF PETITIONER'S RIGHTS

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 16, 2001

__________________

Date

1 The Commission notes that the court's decision references an EEO

complaint filed by petitioner, however at this time there are no appeals

from petitioner before the Commission. If petitioner's EEO complaint

includes his removal, the agency shall continue to process the matter,

rather than have petitioner file a new complaint, if it has not already

done so.