Valerie R. Dede, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 11, 1999
01973906 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 11, 1999)

01973906

02-11-1999

Valerie R. Dede, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Valerie R. Dede v. United States Postal Service

01973906

February 11, 1999

Valerie R. Dede, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01973906

) Agency No. 4C-440-0008-97

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The appellant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final

decision, dated March 25, 1997, which the agency issued pursuant to EEOC

Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) and (b). The Commission accepts the

appellant's appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

The final agency decision defined ten allegations raised by the

appellant's complaint. The decision accepted allegations 8, 9, and 10

for investigation. The decision dismissed allegations 1 through 7 for

untimely EEO counselor contact. In addition, the decision dismissed

allegations 4, 5, and 7 as identical and arising from the same

transactions as the matter raised in agency case number 4C-440-1326-96.

The parties have not raised any contentions on appeal.

After a review of the record, the Commission finds that allegations

4, 5 and 7 (pertaining to sick leave documentation) are inexplicably

intertwined with matter that is the subject of the previously filed

complaint (notice of removal). Therefore, the Commission finds that

the agency properly dismissed these allegations from this complaint.

In so finding, the Commission cautions the agency that it is required to

include the dismissed matters in the investigation of the prior complaint

unless the prior complaint is otherwise resolved.

The Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed allegations 1,

2, 3, and 6 as untimely filed. These incidents allegedly occurred prior

to the removal notice that was the subject of the appellant's prior

complaint and, therefore, should have been raised in the prior complaint.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the Commission AFFIRMS the agency's

dismissal of the appellant's November 1, 1996 complaint allegations.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 11, 1999

Date Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations