01A43076_r
07-29-2004
Ural P. Dean, Complainant, v. Ann M. Veneman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.
Ural P. Dean v. Department of Agriculture
01A43076
July 29, 2004
.
Ural P. Dean,
Complainant,
v.
Ann M. Veneman,
Secretary,
Department of Agriculture,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A43076
Agency No. 030209
DECISION
Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's February 24, 2004
decision dismissing her complaint. Complainant alleges discrimination
on the bases of sex, race, and reprisal when: (1) on July 24, 1992, her
duties were usurped and as a result, she was removed from federal service;
and (2) the Office of Civil Rights (CR) officials improperly processed
her complaints when it provided information to the Commission on appeal
in a previous case. The agency dismissed claim 1 for stating the same
claim that is pending before or decided by the agency or Commission
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The agency dismissed claim 2
for alleging dissatisfaction with the processing of a previously filed
complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(8).
We note, first, that complainant does not challenge the framing of the
claim. With regard to claim 1, the record indicates that the Commission
issued a decision on one of complainant's previously filed complaints
identified as EEOC Appeal No. 01995379; Agency No. 921113. Ural Perryman
Dukes v. Department of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal No. 01995379 (April 16,
2002). According to the decision, complainant alleges discrimination
on the bases of race, color, sex, disability and reprisal when on July
24, 1992, she was removed from federal service and when her duties were
usurped. Id. We find the instant complaint states the same claim as EEOC
Appeal No. 01995379. Thus, claim 1 was properly dismissed pursuant to
29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).
With regard to claim 2, we find that complainant's claim alleges
dissatisfaction with the processing of a previously filed complaint.
Thus, claim 2 was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(8).
The agency's decision dismissing complaint's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
July 29, 2004
__________________
Date