Tonia Davis, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 9, 2012
0120114097 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 9, 2012)

0120114097

02-09-2012

Tonia Davis, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.




Tonia Davis,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120114097

Agency No. 4H300015811

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated August 1, 2011, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Clerk at the Agency’s facility in Athens, Georgia.

On June 28, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging

that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of race

(African-American), sex (female), and reprisal for prior protected EEO

activity when:

1. on March 2, 2011, she was referred to EAP;

2. beginning on an unspecified date, other employees have worked

Complainant’s bid assignment while Complainant has been given

assignments outside her bid; and

3. on March 30, 2011, when Complainant requested help with a lifter,

she was told

that she should not be working at the post office if she could not work

the Gaylord boxes.

The record further indicates that during the informal stage, Complainant

raised two additional allegations regarding investigative interviews held

on January 23 and February 28, 2011. However, the record indicates that

Complainant did not include those claims in her June 28, 2011 complaint

filed with the Agency. Finally, the record indicates that Complainant

also raised issues concerning the alleged breach of a March 17, 2010

settlement agreement entered into by the parties.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §

1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. The instant appeal

followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee

or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). When the complainant does not

allege he or she is aggrieved within the meaning of the regulations,

the agency shall dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1).

With regard to claims 1 and 3, we find that Complainant has failed to

allege that she was adversely affected concerning the terms and conditions

of her employment by the alleged Agency conduct described. Moreover,

the Commission finds that claims 1 and 3, even if proven to be true

and viewed in a light most favorable to Complainant, would not indicate

that Complainant has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently

severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment. See Cobb

v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March 13,

1997). Finally, the alleged action was not of a type reasonably likely

to deter Complainant or others from engaging in protected activity.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing claims 1 and 3 of

the instant complaint is affirmed.

In its final decision, the Agency also found that claim 2 failed to state

a claim. In claim 2, Complainant alleges that on an ongoing basis,

she has been given assignments outside her bid, while other employees

have been assigned to work in her bid area. Upon review, we find that

claim 2 states a claim since Complainant was alleging that she was treated

differently than similarly situated employees outside her protected groups

on a continuing basis concerning her work assignments. Accordingly,

the Agency’s final decision dismissing claim 2 for failure to state

a claim is reversed. Claim 2, therefore, is remanded to the Agency.

We note here that in its final decision, the Agency further indicates

that during the informal states of the instant matter, Complainant raised

additional allegations concerning investigative interviews on January 23

and February 28, 2011, but failed to include them in her June 28, 2011

formal complaint. The Commission has long held that where a complainant

raises a matter at counseling but later does not include that issue in

the formal complaint, she cannot resurrect it later during processing

or file another complaint concerning the abandoned claim. See Robinson

v. Peace Corps., EEOC Request No. 05940710 (May 2, 1995); Small v. Post

Master General, EEOC Request No. 05980289 (July 16, 1999).

Finally, we note that Complainant also raised allegations regarding the

breach of a March 17, 2010 settlement agreement between the parties.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.504(a) provides that if the complainant

believes that the agency has failed to comply with the terms of a

settlement agreement or decision, the complainant shall notify the EEO

Director, in writing, of the alleged noncompliance within 30 days of when

the complainant knew or should have known of the alleged noncompliance.

To the extent that Complainant claims the breach of a March 17, 2010

settlement agreement between the parties, Complainant is advised to

contact the EEO Director in accordance with EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. §

1614.504(a).

Accordingly, the Agency’s dismissal of claims 1 and 3 is AFFIRMED.

The Agency’s dismissal of claim 2 is REVERSED and REMANDED to the

Agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and the

Order below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (Claim 2)

in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall

acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims

within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final.

The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file

and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one

hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time.

If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the

Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt

of Complainant’s request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0610)

This decision affirms the Agency’s final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the Agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion of

your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion of the

complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.

In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and

eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the

Agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until such time as the Agency

issues its final decision on your complaint. If you file a civil action,

you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the

official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his

or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department”

means the national organization, and not the local office, facility

or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider

and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the

administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 9, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120114097

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120114097