Thomas R. Storkamp, Complainant,v.Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 25, 2005
01a50899 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 25, 2005)

01a50899

04-25-2005

Thomas R. Storkamp, Complainant, v. Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Thomas R. Storkamp v. Department of the Army

01A50899

04-25-05

.

Thomas R. Storkamp,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Francis J. Harvey,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A50899

Agency No. BODNFO0202C0030

Hearing No. 140-2003-08166X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.

Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him on the

bases of his disability (compression fracture in back) and sex when:

in January 2002, he received a memorandum requesting additional medical

information from him, essentially stating that, unless he was able

to perform all the duties of his position, he was at risk of being

removed;<1> and

he was removed from his work area while females with similar disabilities

were allowed to work.<2>

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order because

the Administrative Judge's ultimate finding, that unlawful employment

discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, is

supported by the record.<3>

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

___04-25-05_______________

Date

1 While the memorandum requested additional

medical information from complainant, regarding his ability to perform

�all the duties of his position,� the record reflects that the agency

was trying to ascertain which of his essential duties he could perform.

Complainant's restrictions included no lifting above 20 pounds and no

unassisted pushing of gurneys with patients, and the Officer in Charge

was concerned that, as a Practical Nurse in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit,

complainant's ability to safely perform the duties of his position was

hindered due to his restrictions.

2 The record reflects that the comparators complainant identified as

being allowed to remain in their original positions were not similarly

situated to complainant because those female employees had temporary

restrictions, whereas complainant's were permanent. Nonetheless,

the agency offered complainant positions in an administrative field,

which would have resulted in a higher grade, but complainant refused

those positions.

3 We assume without finding, for the purposes of analysis only, that

complainant is an individual with a disability.