Theresa Montgomery, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 17, 2011
0120111221 (E.E.O.C. May. 17, 2011)

0120111221

05-17-2011

Theresa Montgomery, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific Area), Agency.


Theresa Montgomery,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111221

Agency No. 4F-926-0240-10

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated November 23, 2010, dismissing a formal complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Window/Distribution Clerk at the Agency's North Long Beach Carrier Annex in Long Beach, California. On November 2, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination in reprisal for prior protected activity when:

On August 31, 2010, a supervisor (S) against whom Complainant had previously filed an EEO complaint was returned to her work location, where he would stay close to Complainant, get in front of her, and impede her in the performance of her duties.

On November 23, 2010, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing the formal complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the Agency determined that Complainant did not allege harm sufficient to state a claim and that the allegation, even if true, did not rise to the level of a hostile work environment.

CONTENTIONS ON APPEAL

Complainant, through her representative, elaborates upon the matters raised in the formal complaint. Complainant argues that S was not her supervisor had no reason to be in her work area, and that his actions constitute clear reprisal for Complainant's prior EEO activity.

In response, the Agency stands by the reasons set forth in its final decision.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Agency found that Complainant's allegation should be dismissed because Complainant was not harmed and because the actions complained of were insufficiently severe and/or pervasive to constitute harassment. We note, however, that the Commission interprets the statutory retaliation clauses "to prohibit any adverse treatment that is based on a retaliatory motive and is reasonably likely to deter the charging party or others from engaging in protected activity." EEOC Compliance Manual, Section 8 (Retaliation), at 8-13, 8-14 (May 20, 1998). Under this standard, we find that Complainant's allegation, if true, constitutes an action that is "reasonably likely to deter" Complainant or others from engaging in the EEO process.

CONCLUSION

Based on a thorough review of the record and the contentions on appeal, we REVERSE the Agency's final decision. The instant formal complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 17, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120111221

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111221

5

0120111221