Teresita Alfonso, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 26, 2004
01A42491_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 26, 2004)

01A42491_r

07-26-2004

Teresita Alfonso, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.


Teresita Alfonso v. Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency)

01A42491

July 26, 2004

.

Teresita Alfonso,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Defense Commissary Agency),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A42491

Agency No. DECWP20030004

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the January 20,

2004 final agency decision finding no discrimination with regard to her

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In her complaint, complainant alleged that she

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of disability and reprisal

for prior EEO activity when:

On September 23, 2002, Person A issued a Notice of Proposed Removal; and

On August 9, 2002, complainant's supervisor ignored her doctor's memo

of July 31, 2002, which indicated she was only to perform light duty

due to an injury.

On April 30, 2004, complainant filed a civil action (identified as Civil

Action No. 3:04-CV-00910) in the United States District Court for the

Southern District of California. The record further discloses that

the claims raised therein are the same as those raised in the instant

complaint. The regulation found at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409 provides that

the filing of a civil action "shall terminate Commission processing

of the appeal." Commission regulations mandate dismissal of the EEO

complaint under these circumstances so as to prevent a complainant

from simultaneously pursuing both administrative and judicial remedies

on the same matters, wasting resources, and creating the potential

for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, and in order to grant due

deference to the authority of the federal district court. See Stromgren

v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079 (May 7,

1990); Sandy v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513 (October

19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October 25, 1988).

Accordingly, complainant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 26, 2004

__________________

Date