0120101553
07-29-2010
Teresa P. Brown, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.
Teresa P. Brown,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Southeast Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120101553
Agency No. 1H378001209
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's
decision dated January 22, 2010, dismissing her complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Section
501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,
29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
BACKGROUND
In her complaint, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected her to
discrimination on the bases of sex (female) and disability (back)1 when:
1. After a grievance settlement on February 20, 2009 which indicated her
duties would stay the same and her job would not be reposted, on June 23,
2009, Complainant was given the choice of keeping her job or becoming
unassigned.
The Agency dismissed the claim for failure to state a claim on the grounds
that the claim constitutes a collateral attack on the grievance process.
On appeal, Complainant does not address the Agency's argument concerning
the claim being a collateral attack.
ANALYSIS AND FINDING
Following a review of the record we find that complainant's allegation
constitutes a collateral attack on the Step 2 Grievance Settlement
dated February 20, 2009. We note in this regard that in her Formal
Complaint, Complainant specifically seeks as a remedy enforcement of
the February 2009 agreement. The Commission has held that an employee
cannot use the EEO complaint process to lodge a collateral attack on
another proceeding. Hughes v. Social Security Administration, EEOC
Request No. 05990698 (November 4, 1999). The appropriate forum for
complainant to seek enforcement of the grievance settlement is in the
grievance process itself. Accordingly, the agency's final decision
dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive
for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the
defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
July 29, 2010
__________________
Date
1 The FAD includes age a basis of discrimination. However a review of
the Formal and informal complaints does not indicate Complainant raised
age as a basis.
??
??
??
??
2
0120101553
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120101553