Teresa M. Schultze, Petitioner,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 5, 2002
03A20024 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 5, 2002)

03A20024

04-05-2002

Teresa M. Schultze, Petitioner, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Teresa M. Schultze v. Department of the Army

03A20024

04-05-02

.

Teresa M. Schultze,

Petitioner,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A20024

MSPB No. CH-0752-01-0077-I-1

DECISION

On January 03, 2002, petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (the Commission) for review of the

Final Order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board) issued

November 29, 2001, concerning her claim that the agency discriminated

against her on the basis of reprisal (prior protected EEO activity) when

she was removed in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The MSPB found that

the agency had not engaged in discrimination as alleged by petitioner.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes an

incorrect interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, or is not supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

Based upon a thorough review of the record, it is the decision of

the Commission to CONCUR with the final order of the MSPB finding

no discrimination. The Commission finds that the MSPB's decision

constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws, rules, regulations,

and policies governing this matter and is supported by the evidence

in the record as a whole. Further, the Board's ultimate finding, that

unlawful employment discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of

the evidence, is supported by the record.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

_04-05-02_________________

Date