Tanya L. Jones, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 18, 2001
01981423 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 18, 2001)

01981423

09-18-2001

Tanya L. Jones, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Tanya L. Jones v. U.S. Postal Service

01981423

09-18-01

.

Tanya L. Jones,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01981423

Agency No. 4D-200-1220-95

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal of a final agency decision (FAD)

concerning her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination on the

basis of reprisal (prior EEO activity) in violation of Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e

et seq. For the reasons stated herein, the agency's FAD is reversed.

According to the record, complainant was employed as a Distribution

Window Clerk, PS-5 at a Maryland facility of the agency. On January

30 and 31, 1995, February 21, 1995, and April 7, 1995, complainant

attended a hearing before an EEOC administrative judge regarding a prior

EEO complaint. As a result, on the aforementioned dates, complainant

accrued more than eight work hours in one work day and, consequently,

more than forty work hours in one work week. The agency, however,

paid complainant her regular hourly base rate for the overtime hours

she accrued. Believing she was a victim of discrimination, complainant

sought EEO counseling and, subsequently, filed a complaint alleging that

the agency discriminated against her when it failed to pay her at the

overtime rate<1> and penalty overtime rate<2>.

The agency stated that complainant was paid her regular hourly base

rate for attending the EEOC hearings in accordance with the collective

bargaining agreement (CBA) between the agency and the representative

union, the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and agency policy.

Essentially, the agency indicated that it can only pay employees premium

wages for actual work, which does not include participation in the

EEO process. The agency stated further that, in accordance with EEOC

regulations, complainant was granted reasonable official time to attend

the EEOC hearing.

An investigation was conducted and complainant was informed of her right

to choose either a hearing before an EEOC administrative judge (AJ) or

an immediate FAD. Complainant failed to make an election so the agency

issued a FAD, in which it found no discrimination because complainant

failed to establish pretext.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605(b) provides in pertinent part: �The

complainant and representative, if employed by the agency and otherwise

in a pay status, shall be on official time, regardless of their tour of

duty, when their presence is authorized or required by the agency or the

Commission during the investigation, informal adjustment, or hearing on

the complaint." In addition, the EEOC's Management Directive (MD-110)

states that "[w]hatever time is spent in [official EEO] meetings [or]

hearings is automatically deemed reasonable. . . . If a complainant or

representative has already worked a full week and must attend a hearing

or meeting on an off day, that complainant or representative is entitled

to official time, which may require that the agency pay overtime.� EEOC

Management Directive (MD-110), November 9, 1999, pg. 6-16.

Complainant's complaint alleges reprisal discrimination when the agency

improperly denied her overtime associated with her attendance at the

EEO hearings at issue. The Commission, however, finds that the more

appropriate analysis is whether complainant was entitled to official time

as provided under 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605(b). We note in this regard that

it is not relevant whether the agency's action was motivated by reprisal

against the complainant's prior EEO activity. The agency, by denying

complainant overtime pay to attend her EEO hearing, essentially denied

her official time, which violates 29 C.F.R. � 1614.605(b). See Edwards

v. U. S. Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05950708 (October 31, 1996).

The Commission has authority to remedy such a violation, without a finding

of discrimination. Id. For the aforementioned reason, we hereby REVERSE

the agency's final decision.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to pay complainant at an overtime rate or a

penalty overtime rate, whichever is appropriate, for the time she

spent participating in the EEO hearing held in January, February, and

April 1995 beyond her scheduled tour of duty. If there is a dispute

regarding the exact amount of payment, the agency shall issue a check

to the complainant for the undisputed amount within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date the agency determines the amount it believes to be due.

The complainant may petition for enforcement or clarification of the

amount in dispute. The petition for enforcement or clarification must

be filed with the Compliance Officer, at the address referenced in the

statement entitled �Implementation of the Commmission's Decision.�

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__09-18-01________________

Date

1Overtime pay is paid at the rate of one and

one-half (1 �) times the regular hourly base rate. It is paid for work

performed in excess of eight (8) hours in any one work day or forty (40)

hours in any one work week.

2Penalty overtime pay is paid at the rate of two (2) times the regular

hourly base rate. It is paid where an employee has to work overtime on

more than four of the employee's five scheduled days in a work week or

more than ten hours on a regular scheduled work day.