Takai et al.v.TakaiDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesMar 30, 199808250658 (B.P.A.I. Mar. 30, 1998) Copy Citation Application No. 07/923,596, filed August 3, 1992, now1 U.S. Patent No. 5,338,357, issued August 16, 1994. Accorded Benefit of Japanese Application No. 3-282268, filed October 1, 1991. Assignor to Polyfibre S.A., Nyon. Application No. 08/250,658, filed May 27, 1994. 2 Accorded Benefit of U.S. Application No. 07/936,000, filed August 27, 1992, now abandoned; and Japanese Application No. 3-282268, filed October 1, 1991. -1- THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ YOUSUKE TAKAI, JOSEF STUDINKA and BENOIT DE LHONEUX Junior Party,1 v. YOUSUKE TAKAI Senior Party.2 ________________ Interference No. 103,860 Before URYNOWICZ, SOFOCLEOUS and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. Interference No. 103,980 -2- SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Pursuant to the decision on preliminary motions, it is hereby adjudged that an interference-in-fact does not exist. Accordingly, on the present record, Yousuke Takai, Josef Studinka And Benoit De Lhoneux, the junior party, are entitled to a patent containing claims 1 to 16, and Yousuke Takai, the senior party, is entitled to a patent containing claims 1 to 9. STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) MICHAEL SOFOCLEOUS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) MARY F. DOWNEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation