Steven G. Constable, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 2, 2003
01A23389_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 2, 2003)

01A23389_r

07-02-2003

Steven G. Constable, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Steven G. Constable v. United States Postal Service

01A23389

July 2, 2003

.

Steven G. Constable,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A23389

Agency No. 4B-120-0041-02

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's decision dated

May 29, 2002, dismissing his complaint of discrimination for stating a

claim already pending before the agency in an earlier complaint. In a

complaint dated May 16, 2002, complainant alleged that, throughout April

and May of 2002, the agency discriminated against him on the basis of age

(49) and retaliated against him for filing previous EEO complaints by

continuing to deny him opportunities to serve as an Acting Supervisor

(204B) or as the Officer-in-Charge (OIC). In its decision dismissing

the complaint, the agency determined that complainant had raised the

issue of being denied 204B and OIC assignments in two other complaints:

4B-120-0114-01 and 4B-120-0061-00.

An agency must dismiss a complaint that states a claim that is pending

before it, or before the Commission. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

On August 6, 2001, complainant filed Complaint No. 4B-120-0114-01, in

which he claimed that the agency retaliated against him for previous

EEO activity by denying him a 204B training since, �January 1, 2002 and

continuing.� In Complaint No. 4B-120-0061-00, filed on September 15, 2000,

complainant alleged that he had been denied opportunities to serve as a

204B and OIC since �July 1, 2000, and continuing.� In both complaints,

complainant is raising the same claim, namely the agency's ongoing failure

to grant him an opportunity to serve in an acting supervisory capacity.

Complainant has not identified any specific circumstances that distinguish

the incidents raised in the instant complaint from those raised in the

two previous complaints. The Commission therefore finds, as did the

agency, that complainants claim regarding failure to be selected for 204B

vacancies is the same claim that he raised in complaints 4B-120-0114-01

and 4B-120-0061-00.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 2, 2003

__________________

Date